Skip to Main Content
42
Views
1
CrossRef citations
Altmetric

Articles

Science and Psychotherapy

Developing Research-Based Knowledge That Enhances the Effectiveness of Practice

Pages 82-101
Published online: 28 Dec 2017

    References

  • AmbleI.GudeT.StubdalS.AndersenB. J.WampoldB. (2015). The effect of implementing the Outcome Questionnaire 45.2 feedback system in Norway: A multisite randomized clinical trial in a naturalistic setting. Psychotherapy Research, 25, 669677. doi:10.1080/10503307.2014.928756 
  • ArriagaM. (2014). Rebooting democracy: A citizen’s guide to reinventing politics. London, England: Thistle Publishing. 
  • AtkinsL.SmithJ. A.KellyM. P.MichieS. (2013). The process of developing evidence-based guidance in medicine and public health: A qualitative study of views from the inside. Implementation Science, 8(101). Retrieved from http://www.implementationscience.com/content/8/1/101 
  • BergnerR. M. (2006). Many secure knowledge bases of psychotherapy. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 60, 215231. 
  • BetanE. J.BinderJ. L. (2010). Clinical expertise in psychotherapy: How expert therapists use theory in generating case conceptualizations and interventions. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 40, 141152. 
  • BoswellJ. F.KrausD. R.MillerS. D.LambertM. J. (2015). Implementing routine outcome monitoring in clinical practice: Benefits, challenges, and solutions. Psychotherapy Research, 25, 619. doi:10.1080/10503307.2013.817696 
  • BowensM.CooperM. (2012). Development of a client feedback tool: A qualitative study of therapists’ experiences of using the therapy personalisation forms. European Journal of Psychotherapy & Counselling, 14, 4762. doi:10.1080/13642537.2012.652392 
  • Brown J. B. (Ed.). (2012). Philosophy of science: The key thinkers. New York, NY: Continuum. 
  • BrownP.HashemF.CalnanM. (2016). Trust, regulatory processes and NICE decision-making: Appraising cost-effectiveness models through appraising people and systems. Social Studies of Science, 46, 87111. doi:10.1177/0306312715609699 
  • CleggJ. W. (2016). Reconsidering philosophy of science pedagogy in psychology: An evaluation of methods texts. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 36(4), 199213. 
  • CooperM.McLeodJ. (2011). Pluralistic counselling and psychotherapy. London, England: Sage. 
  • CraigP.DieppeP.MacintyreS.MichieS.NazarethI.PetticrewM. (2008). Developing and evaluating complex interventions: The new Medical Research Council guidance. British Medical Journal, 337: a1655. 
  • CuijpersP.AnderssonG.DonkerT.van StratenA. (2011). Psychological treatment of depression: Results of a series of meta-analyses. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry, 65, 354364. 
  • CuijpersP.CristeaI. A. (2016). How to prove that your therapy is effective, even when it is not: A guideline. Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences, 25, 428435. doi:10.1017/S2045796015000864 
  • DavidsonK.PerryA.BellL. (2015). Would continuous feedback of patient’s clinical outcomes to practitioners improve NHS psychological therapy services? Critical analysis and assessment of quality of existing studies. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 88, 2137. doi:10.1111/papt.12032 
  • DaviesJ. (2014). Cracked: Why psychiatry is doing more harm than good. London, England: Icon Books. 
  • de JongK.van SluisP.NugterM. A.HeiserW. J.SpinhovenP. (2012). Understanding the differential impact of outcome monitoring: Therapist variables that moderate feedback effects in a randomized clinical trial. Psychotherapy Research, 22, 464474. 
  • DragiotiE.DimoliatisI.EvangelouE. (2015). Disclosure of researcher allegiance in meta-analyses and randomised controlled trials of psychotherapy: A systematic appraisal. BMJ Open, 5: e007206. 
  • FergusonC. J. (2015). “Everybody knows psychology is not a real science”: Public perceptions of psychology and how we can improve our relationship with policymakers, the scientific community, and the general public. American Psychologist, 70, 527542. doi:10.1037/a0039405 
  • FeyerabendP. K. (1972). Against method: Outline of an anarchistic theory of knowledge. London, England: New Left Books. 
  • FishmanD. B.MesserS. B.EdwardsD. J. A.DattilioF. M. (Eds.). (2017). Case studies within psychotherapy trials: Expanding the gold standard. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. 
  • GrahamT.AldersonP.StokesT. (2015). Managing conflicts of interest in the UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) clinical guidelines programme: Qualitative study. PLoS ONE, 10(3): e0122313. Retrieved from http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0122313 
  • GreggJ. A.CallaghanG. M.HayesS. C. (2007). The diabetes lifestyle book: Facing your fears and making changes for a long and healthy life. Oakland, CA: New Harbinger Publications. 
  • GreggJ. A.CallaghanG. M.HayesS. C.Glenn-LawsonJ. L. (2007). Improving diabetes self-management through acceptance, mindfulness, and values: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 75(2), 336343. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.75.2.336 
  • GreggJ. A.HayesS. C. (2015). The progression of programmatic research in contextual behavioral science: Response to O’Donohue, Snipes, and Soto. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 1-9. doi:10.1007/s10879-015-9312-5 
  • HansenJ. T. (2006). Counseling theories within a postmodernist epistemology: New roles for theories in counseling practice. Journal of Counseling and Development, 84, 291297. 
  • HansenJ. T. (2007). Counseling without truth: Toward a neopragmatic foundation for counseling practice. Journal of Counseling and Development, 85, 423430. 
  • HansenJ. T. (2012). Extending the humanistic vision: Toward a humanities foundation for the counseling profession. Journal of Humanistic Counseling, 51, 133144. 
  • HarmonS. C.LambertM. J.SmartD. M.HawkinsE.NielsenS. L.SladeK.LutzW. (2007). Enhancing outcome for potential treatment failures: Therapist-client feedback and clinical support tools. Psychotherapy Research, 17, 379392. 
  • HjørlandB. (2011). Evidence-based practice: An analysis based on the philosophy of science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62, 13011310. doi:10.1002/asi21523 
  • HoshmandL. T. (2001). Psychotherapy as an instrument of culture. In SlifeB. D.WilliamsR. N.BarlowS. H. (Eds.), Critical issues in psychotherapy (pp. 99113). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. 
  • IonitaG.FitzpatrickM.TomaroJ.ChenV. V.OveringtonL. (2016). Challenges of using progress monitoring measures: Insights from practicing clinicians. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 63, 173182. 
  • JohnsenT. J.FriborgO. (2015). The effects of cognitive behavioral therapy as an anti-depressive treatment is falling: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 141, 747768. 
  • KnaapenL. (2013). Being “evidence-based” in the absence of evidence: The management of non-evidence in guideline development. Social Studies of Science, 43, 681706. doi:10.1177/0306312713483679 
  • KuhnT. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. 
  • LakatosI. (1970). Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programs. In LakatosI.MusgraveA. (Eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge (pp. 91196). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. 
  • LambertM. J. (Ed.). (2013). Bergin and Garfield’s handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (5th ed.). New York, NY: Wiley. 
  • LatourB. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 
  • LevittH. M.PomervilleA.SuraceF. I. (2016). A qualitative meta-analysis examining clients’ experiences of psychotherapy: A new agenda. Psychological Bulletin, 142(8), 801830. 
  • LewinS.GlentonC.OxmanA. D. (2009). Use of qualitative methods alongside randomised controlled trials of complex healthcare interventions: Methodological study. British Medical Journal, 339: b3496. 
  • LuborskyL.DiguerL.SeligmanD. A.RosenthalR.KrauseE. D.JohnsonS. (1999). The researcher’s own therapy allegiances: A “wild card” in comparisons of treatment efficacy. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 6, 95106. 
  • MaceC. (2002). Research and the organization of knowledge—Where do psychotherapy and counseling fit in? European Journal of Psychotherapy, Counselling and Health, 5, 359369. 
  • MahrerA. R. (2000). Philosophy of science and the foundations of psychotherapy. American Psychologist, 55, 11171125. 
  • McCannP. V.LubmanD. I. (2014). Qualitative process evaluation of a problem-solving guided self-help manual for family carers of young people with first-episode psychosis. BMC Psychiatry, 14, 168. doi:10.1186/1471-244X-14-168 
  • McLeodJ. (2002). Research policy and practice in person-centered and experiential therapy: Restoring coherence. Person-Centered and Experiential Psychotherapies, 1, 87101. 
  • McLeodJ. (2013). An introduction to research in counselling and psychotherapy. London, England: Sage. 
  • McLeodJ. (2016). Using research in counselling and psychotherapy. London, England: Sage. 
  • McLeodJ. (2017). Qualitative methods for routine outcome measurement. In RousmaniereT. G.GoodyearR.MillerS. D.WampoldB. (Eds.), The cycle of excellence: Using deliberate practice to improve supervision and training (pp. 85107). London, England: Wiley. 
  • MoltuC.VesethM.StefansenJ.NøtnesJ. C.SkjølbergÅ.BinderP. E.CastonguayL. G.NordbergS. S. (2016). This is what I need a clinical feedback system to do for me: A qualitative inquiry into therapists’ and patients’ perspectives. Psychotherapy Research. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2016.1189619 
  • MoncrieffJ.TimimiS. (2013). The social and cultural construction of psychiatric knowledge: An analysis of NICE guidelines on depression and ADHD. Anthropology & Medicine, 20, 5971. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13648470.2012.747591 
  • NosekB. A.Bar-AnanY. (2012). Scientific utopia: 1. Opening scientific communication. Psychological Inquiry, 23, 217243. 
  • OakleyA.StrangeV.BonellC.AllenE.StephensonJ. (2006). Process evaluation in randomised controlled trials of complex interventions. British Medical Journal, 332, 413416. doi:10.1136/bmj.332.7538.413 
  • O’DonohueW. T.SnipesC.SotoC. (2015). A case study of overselling psychotherapy: An ACT intervention for diabetes management. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 46(1), 1525. doi:10.1007/s10879-015-9308-1 
  • O’DonohueW.SnipesC.SotoC. (2016). The design, manufacture, and reporting of weak and pseudo-tests: The case of ACT. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 46, 3740. doi:10.1007/s10879-015-9316-1 
  • OrlinskyD. E. (2009). The “generic model of psychotherapy” after 25 years: Evolution of a research-based metatheory. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 19, 319339. 
  • OveringtonL.IonitaG. (2012). Progress monitoring measures: A brief guide. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 53, 8292. doi:10.1037/a0028017 
  • PagliariC.GrimshawJ. (2002). Impact of group structure and process on multidisciplinary evidence-based guideline development: An observational study. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 8, 145153. 
  • PearsonM.CoomberR. (2009). The challenge of external validity in policy-relevant systematic reviews: A case study from the field of substance misuse. Addiction, 105, 136145. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02713.x 
  • PolkinghorneD. (1983). Methodology for the human sciences: Systems of inquiry. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press. 
  • PolkinghorneD. E. (1992). Postmodern epistemology of practice. In KvaleS. (Ed.), Psychology and postmodernism (pp. 123135). London, England: Sage. 
  • PopperK. R. (1972). Conjectures and refutations: The growth of scientific knowledge. New York, NY: Harper & Row. 
  • RapaportD.GillM. (1959). The points of view and assumptions of metapsychology. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 40, 15362. 
  • RogersC. R. (1959). A theory of therapy, personality, and interpersonal relationships, as developed in the client-centered framework. In KochS. (Ed.), Psychology: A study of a science. Vol. 3: Formulations of the person and the social context (pp. 184256). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. 
  • RosenG. M.LilienfeldS. O. (2016). On the failure of psychology to advance self-help: Acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) as a case example. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 46, 7177. doi:10.1007/s10879-015-9319-y 
  • RousmaniereT. G.GoodyearR.MillerS. D.WampoldB. (Eds.). (2017). The cycle of excellence: Using deliberate practice to improve supervision and training. London, England: Wiley. 
  • SandelowskiM.VoilsC. I.BarrosoJ. (2006). Defining and designing mixed research synthesis studies. Research in the Schools, 13, 29. 
  • SlifeB. D.GanttE. E. (1999). Methodological pluralism: A framework for psychotherapy research. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 55, 14531465. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-4679(199912)55:123.0.CO;2-C 
  • SmithM. L.GlassG. V.MillerT. E. (1980). The benefits of psychotherapy. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press. 
  • SpenceD. P. (1982). Narrative truth and historical truth: Meaning and interpretation in psychoanalysis. New York, NY: Norton. 
  • SundetR. (2009). Therapeutic collaboration and formalized feedback: Using perspectives from Vygotsky and Bakhtin to shed light on practices in a family therapy unit. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 15, 8195. doi:10.1177/1359104509341449 
  • TschuschkeV.CrameriA.KoehlerM.BerglarJ.MuthK.StaczanP.Koemeda-LutzM. (2015). The role of therapists’ treatment adherence, professional experience, therapeutic alliance, and clients’ severity of psychological problems: Prediction of treatment outcome in eight different psychotherapy approaches. Preliminary results of a naturalistic study. Psychotherapy Research, 25, 420434. doi:10.1080/10503307.2014.896055 
  • UnsworthG.CowieH.GreenA. (2012). Therapists’ and clients’ perceptions of routine outcome measurement in the NHS: A qualitative study. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 12, 7180. doi:10.1080/14733145.2011.565125 
  • WampoldB.ImelM. (2015). The great psychotherapy debate: The evidence for what makes psychotherapy work (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge. 
  • WhitakerR.CosgroveL. (2015). Psychiatry under the influence: Institutional corruption, social injury, and prescriptions for reform. London, England: Palgrave Macmillan. 
  • WiddowsonM. (2014). Avoidance, vicious cycles, and experiential disconfirmation of script: Two new theoretical concepts and one mechanism of change in the psychotherapy of depression and anxiety. Transactional Analysis Journal, 44, 194207. 
  • WiddowsonM. (2015). Transactional analysis for depression. A step-by-step treatment manual. London, England: Routledge. 
  • WoottonD. (2006). Bad medicine: Doctors doing harm since Hippocrates. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. 
 

People also read