Abstract
This article investigates the meaning of bystanding behavior in ordinary life as well as in psychotherapeutic practice. The sequence of five critical choice points at which an individual can intervene responseably is considered. Some of the motivations and rationalizations for bystanding and the psychological costs thereof are surveyed. A theoretical contribution to TA — the role of the Bystander (or audience) — gives context to the Karpman Drama Triangle (1968) in terms of both the backdrop of history and the consent of the observers. The place of guilt and responsibility for change within a humanistic/existential framework such as TA is also discussed.