Skip to Main Content
10
Views
0
CrossRef citations
Altmetric

Articles

Transactional Analysis Counseling Groups

Theory, Practice, and How They Differ from Other TA Groups

Pages 68-79
Published online: 28 Dec 2017

    References

  • AllenJ. R. (2003). Concepts, competencies, and interpretive communities. Transactional Analysis Journal, 33, 126147. 
  • AnzieuD. (1981). Le group et l’incoscient [Group and the unconscious]. Paris, France: Dunod. 
  • BerneE. (1961). Transactional analysis in psychotherapy: A systematic individual and social psychiatry. New York, NY: Grove Press. 
  • BerneE. (1966). Principles of group treatment. New York, NY: Grove Press. 
  • BerneE. (1972). What do you say after you say hello?: The psychology of human destiny. New York, NY: Grove Press. 
  • ClarkeJ. I. (1981). Differences between special fields and clinical groups. Transactional Analysis Journal, 11, 169170. 
  • CornellW. (1988). Life script theory: A critical review from a developmental perspective. Transactional Analysis Journal, 18, 270282. 
  • CornellW. F. (2013). “Special fields”: A brief history of an anxious dilemma and its lingering consequences for transactional analysis counselors. Transactional Analysis Journal, 43, 713. 
  • CornellW. F.HineJ. (1999). Cognitive and social functions of emotions: A model for transactional analysis counselor training. Transactional Analysis Journal, 29, 175185. 
  • EnglishF. (1977). What shall I do tomorrow? In BarnesG. (Ed.), Transactional analysis after Eric Berne: Teachings and practices of three TA schools (pp. 287350). New York, NY: Harper’s College Press. 
  • European Association for Transactional Analysis [EATA]. (2008). Training and examination handbook. Retrieved from http://www.eatanews.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/Section-5-The-Four-Fields2.pdf 
  • Fassbind-KechL. (2011). If we are not merely second-rate psychotherapists—What else are we? EATA Newsletter, 102, 2025. 
  • FregolaC. (2011). Analisi transazionale in campo ducativo [Transactional analysis in the educational field]. IAT News,1, 67. 
  • GrégoireJ. (1998). Criteria for defining the boundaries of TA fields of application. Transactional Analysis Journal, 28, 311320. 
  • HorewitzJ. S. (1978). Family therapy and transactional analysis. New York, NY: Jason Aronson. 
  • KarpmanS. (1968). Fairy tales and script drama analysis. Transactional Analysis Bulletin, 7(26), 3943. 
  • LoomisM. (1982). Contracting for change. Transactional Analysis Journal, 12, 5154. 
  • MasseyR. (1985). TA as a family systems therapy. Transactional Analysis Journal, 15, 120140. 
  • MiglionicoA. (2000). Manuale di comunicazione e counselling [Communication and counseling manual]. Turin, Italy: CSE. 
  • MoisoC. (1998). Il setting in psicoterapia di gruppo [The setting in group psychotherapy]. In NovellinoM., L’approccio clinico dell’analisi transazionale (pp. 6687). Milan, Italy: Franco Angeli. 
  • NapperR. (2010). Il genio di Berne e l’ampiezza della portata dell’AT [Berne’s genius and the extent of TA influence]. IAT News, 4, 1011. 
  • NovellinoM. (1990). Conflitto intrapsichico e ridecisione [Intrapsychic conflict and redecision]. Rome, Italy: Città Nuova. 
  • NovellinoM. (1998). L’approccio clinico dell’analisi transazionale [The clinical approach in transactional analysis]. Milan, Italy: Franco Angeli. 
  • RogersC. R. (1970). Encounter groups. New York, NY: Harper & Row. 
  • TudorK. (1997). Counselling or psychotherapy: An issue of orientation. ITA News, 47, 4042. 
  • TudorK. (1999). Group counselling. London, England: Sage Publications. 
  • VinellaP. (2000). I diversi setting del counselling [The different setting of counseling]. In MiglionicoA. Manuale di comunicazione e counselling (pp. 316331). Turin, Italy: CSE.