Skip to Main Content
19
Views
9
CrossRef citations
Altmetric

Article

An Analysis of Nonverbal Transactions Drawing on Theories of Intersubjectivity

Pages 173-186
Published online: 28 Dec 2017

    References

  • AllenJ. R. (2000). Biology and transactional analysis II: A status report on neurodevelopmentTransactional Analysis Journal, 30, 260269. 
  • AronL. (2001). A meeting of minds: Mutuality in psychoanalysis. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press. 
  • BatesonG. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind. New York: Ballantine. 
  • BeebeB., JaffeJ., & LachmannF. M. (1992). A dyadic systems view of communication. In SkolnickN. J. & WarshawS. C., Relational psychoanalysis (pp. 6182). Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press. 
  • BenjaminJ. (1988). The bonds of love. New York: Pantheon Books. 
  • BerneE. (1994). Principles of group treatment. Menlo Park: Shea Books. (Original work published 1966) 
  • BrazeltonT. B., & CramerB. G. (1991). The earliest relationship: Parents, infants and the drama of early attachment. London: Karnac Books. 
  • BrazeltonT. B., TronickE., AdamsonL., AlsH., & WiseS. (1975). Early mother-infant reciprocity [Ciba Foundation Symposium 33], Amsterdam: Elsevier. 
  • BrunerJ. S. (1977). Early social interaction and language acquisition. In SchafferH. R. (Ed.), Studies in mother-infant interaction. London: Academic Press. 
  • BrunerJ. S. (1981). Intention in the structure of action and interaction. In LipsittL. P. (Ed.), Advances in infancy research (Vol. 1). NJ: Ablex. 
  • ChodorowN. (1978). The reproduction of mothering. Berkeley: University of California Press. 
  • CornellW. F. (1988). Critique of script theory. Transactional Analysis Journal, 18, 270282. 
  • CornellW. F., & HargadenH. (in press). From transactions to relations. London: Haddon Press. 
  • DiamondN., & MarroneM. (2003). Attachment and intersubjectivity. London: Whurr Publishers. 
  • EigenM. (1993). The electrified tightrope (PhillipsA., Ed.). Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson. 
  • Vas-DepeursingeE. Fi (1991). Documenting a time-bound, circular view of hierarchies: A microanalysis of parent-infant dyadic interaction. Family Process, 30, 101120. 
  • FrommE. (1960). Psychoanalysis and Zen Buddhism. In SuzukiD. T., FrommE., & DeMartinoR. (Eds.), Zen Buddhism and psychoanalysis. New York: Harper & Row. 
  • GoldnerV. (1991). Toward a critical relational theory of gender. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 249272. 
  • HargadenH. (2004, 9 June). Two-chair work. Message posted to http://relationalta@topica.com (to access, see www.relationalta.co.uk). 
  • HargadenH., & SillsC. (2002). Transactional analysis: A relational perspective. London: Brunner/Routledge. 
  • KohutH. (1971). The analysis of the self. New York: International Universities Press. 
  • MarionJ.-L. (1998). Reduction and givenness: Investigations of Husserl, Heidegger, and phenomenology (Studies in phenomenology and existential philosophy) (CarlsonT. A., Trans.). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press. 
  • MiellD., & DallosR. (1996). Social interaction and personal relationships. London: Sage. 
  • MitchellS. A. (1988). The intrapsychic and the interpersonal: Different theories, different domains, or historical artifacts. Psychoanalytic Inquiries, 8, 472496. 
  • MoisoC. (1985). Ego states and transference. Transactional Analysis Journal, 15, 194201. 
  • NovellinoM. (1990). Unconscious communication and interpretation. Transactional Analysis Journal, 20, 168172. 
  • OatesJ. (1994). First relationships. In OatesJ. (Ed), The foundations of child development (pp. 259298). Oxford: Blackwell/The Open University. 
  • OgdenT. (1992). Projective identification and psychotherapeutic technique. New York: Jason Aronson. 
  • SandlerJ. (1993). On communication from patient to analyst: Not everything is projective identification. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 74, 10971107. 
  • StarkM. (1998). When the body meets the mind: What body psychotherapy can learn from psychoanalysis. Panel presentation at the First National Conference of the United States Association for Body Psychotherapy. 
  • SternD. N. (1985). The interpersonal world of the infant: A view from psychoanalysis and developmental psychology. New York: Basic Books. 
  • StolorowR. (1995). An intersubjective view of self psychology. Psychoanalytic Dialogues. 5, 393400. 
  • SullivanH. S. (1953). The interpersonal theory of psychiatry. New York: Norton. 
  • SummersG., & TudorK. (2000). Cocreative transactional analysis. Transactional Analysis Journal, 30, 2340. 
  • ThompsonC. M. (1964). The role of the analyst's personality in therapy. In GreenM. R. (Ed.), Interpersonal psychoanalysis. New York: Basic Books. (Original work published 1956) 
  • TrevarthenC. (1979). Communication and co-operation in early infancy: A description of primary intersubjecti vity. In BullaraM. (Ed.), Before speech: The beginning of human communication. London: Cambridge University Press. 
  • TrevarthenC. (1984). Emotions in infancy: Regulators of contacts and relationships with persons. In SchererK. & ElkmanP. (Eds.), Approaches to emotions. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 
  • TrevarthenC. (1993). The functions of emotions in early infant communication and development. In NadelJ. & CamioniL. (Eds.), New perspectives in early communicative development [GIVE PAGES], London: Routledge. 
  • VygotskyL. S. (1962). Thought and language (HaufmannE. & VakarG., Eds. & Trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 
  • VygotskyL. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (ColeM., John-SteinerV., ScribnerandS., & SoubermanE., Eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 
  • VygotskyL. S. (1988). The genesis of higher mental functions. In RichardsonK. & SheldonS. (Eds.), Cognitive development to adolescence. Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 
  • WatzlawickP. (1963). A review of the double-bind theory. Family Process, 2(1), 132153. 
 

People also read