This article considers the state of ego state theory in transactional analysis. Based on the hypothesis that there is a confusion in practice and the transactional analysis literature based on different and differing structural models of ego states, the author clarifies Berne's concept of the ego and of ego states by drawing on the earlier work of Federn (1952d), Weiss (1950), and Glover (1955). Following the work of Trautmann and Erskine (1981), Erskine (1988, 1991), Gobes (1990), Oller-Vallejo (1997, 2003), and Wadsworth and DiVincenti (2003), and based on a close reading of Berne's (1961/ 1975a) Transactional Analysis in Psychotherapy, the author clarifies the distinction between two sets of structural ego state models with regard to definitions of ego states, theories of human development, the concept of integration, and views about the goal or end of therapy. While the article is primarily a contribution to the clinical field (psychotherapy and counseling), the clarification of the two sets of models, and especially the differing views of the Adult, has implications for all applications of transactional analysis.

21
Views
4
CrossRef citations
Altmetric
Article
The State of the Ego: Then and Now
Pages 261-277
Published online: 28 Dec 2017
Article
The State of the Ego: Then and Now
People also read
Petrūska Clarkson et al.
Transactional Analysis Journal
Volume 18, 1988 - Issue 1
Published online: 28 Dec 2017
Graeme Summers et al.
Transactional Analysis Journal
Volume 30, 2000 - Issue 1
Published online: 28 Dec 2017
Rebecca L. Trautmann et al.
Transactional Analysis Journal
Volume 11, 1981 - Issue 2
Published online: 28 Dec 2017
Robert Goulding et al.
Transactional Analysis Journal
Volume 6, 1976 - Issue 1
Published online: 28 Dec 2017